Here’s an ‘end of the year 2006’
recap I wrote for NYFS on the Mets pitching… sit back and enjoy this one:
Boy, now here’s a
position Mets fans can get excited about!
It’s amazing that the
biggest question this year for the Mets was the depth of their starting
pitching. At the same time, no position had more quality depth in their minor
league system than starting pitching. Go figure.
The Mets seem to have
double figures in major league potential starters down in their system, spread
out from AAA to the Latin leagues. 4 seem to be ready for the big leagues… Mike Pelfrey, Brian
Bannister, Oliver Perez, and Dave Williams. Oliver and Perez are out of options and will never pass through waivers
after their pitching performances this past month. We know Pedro will be back
and it looks like John Maine will be in next year’s plans. Past that, who the heck knows about Tom Glavine, Steve
Trachsel, Victor
Zembrano and Orlando Hernandez. I’ve mentioned 10 starters. There’s room for 5. You take it from there.
Mack – Don’t we seem to always have this problem?
2008 should graduate Phil Humber and 2009 is a lock for phenom Deolis Guerra, but the question marks are a bunch
of quality 2nd level prospects that also are scheduled to be ‘ready’ in the
next 3 years… Alay Soler… Blake McGinley… Mike Devaney… Jon Niese.
Soler might have had
the most embarrassing debut in many a year and there’s a good chance we may
never see him again at the major league level. McGinley and Devaney both are
control pitchers and their future probably is as long-relievers rather than
rotational starters. And it’s frankly just too early to figure out if Niese has
what it takes to make it in the majors.
Behind them come the
kiddies –two starters stood out at Kingsport, Greg Mullens and Tim Stronach, both of which should start out 2007 at either Brooklyn or Hagerstown.
No one stood out at the GCL level, but Brooklyn featured last year’s Latin
leader, Nelson Portillo, plus Todd Privett, Jacob Ruckle, and Tobi Stoner, all of which should compete for a starting position in 2007 either at
Hagerstown or St. Lucie.
The fact remains that
Pelfrey, Humber, and Guerra seem to insure that the Mets starting rotation will
be properly replenished over the next 3-4 years.
Mack – well, what do we take away from this one…
The first thing that stands out glaringly is the names.
It’s amazing how few of these people ever made a difference.
Of course, I’m not talking about Glavine, but the rest of
the names just make me smile.
I remember when Mike Pelfrey was going to be the original
Matt Harvey. He was going to lead this team to glory.
The other thing you walk away with, similar to now, the
glut of starters trying to make the Queens rotation. Back then, we thought we
had this all figures out and all these pitchers I mentioned in this article
were going to carry us to multiple pennants.
Writing articles about last year’s stats is an exact
science. Writing another article trying to predict next year’s team isn’t. I
seems to have a few things right here. I called for Maine correctly though his
success didn’t last. Guerra was lost in the ‘famous trade’ and Jon Niese turned
out okay, didn’t he?
Articles like this are a fair warning for ‘guppy’
followers. You can write about ceiling’ and ‘5 tool’ all you want, but only
time will tell when things work out. … -
(Mets trade P Noah Syndergaard, C
Kevin Plawecki, P Gabriel Ynoa, and 1B Jayce Boyd to Colorado for SS Troy
Tulowitzki) -
20 comments:
Wow. A sobering look back at how little that extremely positive pitching picture turned into the real thing on the big league level.
My guess is that the current batch of pitching talent outdoes the 2006 picture by a lot...but it all comes down to health, guts, and the ability to deal with 60 feet and 6 inches of prime real estate.
Best wishes for a happy New Year to Mack, Reese, Chris, Ernest, Herb, Lew, Steve from Norfolk, Joe F, and al the rest of you bloggers, writers, and readers.
And to the players, of course.
All in all I'd still like the Mets to hold onto syndergaard, matz, montero and Molina and not flip them for major league talent at this time, no matter the odds against them all succeeding.
Happy new year to everyone. .....good news for me is that I at least figured out how to get my daughter to sleep in her own damn bed now, so this new years will hopefully not be like last year whixh consisted of me quitely in my bed with her when clock struck midnight, and quitely surfing social media to live through others and what they were doing..... (whom I kidding, it was a good way to bring in th new yea
P.S. my new year resolution is to not cry if/when Mets trade my main man Gee, thus preventing me from getting to continue to recycle that picture of the chick with the ain't nuthin but a gee thang t shirt in my future posts.
I enjoyed this.
It brings to mind something I've been thinking about - As Mets fans, shouldn't we be rooting for Logan Verrett to be a Rule 5 success story? If we have a dozen pitchers that we protected ahead of him, doesn't his success bode well in the minds of other GMs as to the value of our guys?
I'm glad to see Mack post a retrospective like this because I feel like he and the other writers on this site are just far too optimistic.
Here is a perfect example: "..2009 is a lock for phenom Deolis Guerra."
So, so many prospects bust, but this site often refers to various prospects as guarantees to contribute.
It just doesn't work like that...each level is harder than the previous level, and prospects often can't make the jump.
Wow. How awful was our pitching down on the farm back then. Nite and day compared to today.
Happy New Years All!
Mack - this is a sobering look - but I have to say that your 2006 take was very much a rose colored glasses view of the Mets' pitching prospects.
If you go back and look at Sickles or the other baseball wide minor league ranking, none of those pitchers were ever rated above C, maybe B status.
The knock on Pelfrey always was his lack of off speed stuff - ditto Guerra.
Interestingly, back in 06, 07, the Mets' pitching prospect who was the most highly rated was Niese - on the strength of his wicked curve ball.
Also note, there is no mention of Dillon Gee anywhere - and there never was - he was viewed as a "AAAA" pitcher who would never have the stuff to make the majors - so the errors go on both sides.
But, here is a few reasons to be more positive about our current crop of pitchers:
1) In 2006, Mazzoni would be considered our #1 or #2 pitching prospect - he is barely on the list in 2014
2) Unlike 2006, today Sickles, Baseball Pro, Baseball America, etc. all rate are top 3 pitching prospects (Thor, Matz, and Monterro) as plus prospects.
3) Unlike, our top pitching prospects have all put up numbers in the high minors to back up their "stuff" - in 2--6, Pelfrey while having good strikeout numbers in AA, also was giving up abut a hit an inning and walking 3 per 9 - not "dominant stats"
4) And, we all knock Omar, but he did a great job of selling high on Humber and Guerra - so, sometimes pitching prospects pay off in ways other than on the field. Keep that in mind if we trade any of the prospects.
Also - it isn't really fair to consider either Williams or Perez "prospects" in 2006 - Williams was 27 years old and had bounced around Cincy for a few years before we got him
Perez had pitched for Pittsburgh for 4 years and was a retread for us as well.
Maine, I believe, would have been a solid ML starter in the Dillon Gee range if not for shoulder injuries.
The only upper level "prospects" on that list were Pelfrey, Bannister and Humber
Not one of them was ever rated like Harvey, Thor, Matz or Monterro.
I do agree with Mack's point - especially when looking at pitchers below AA -- we need to look no further than that great Brooklyn staff of a couple of years ago - most of those guys have flamed out before even hitting AA
Baseball Ameica 2009: Martinez 30, Flores 46, Niese 77, Holt 94
2010... Mejia 56, Wheeler 49, Davis 62, Martinez 77, Flores 77
FWIW
Randy Tate...Wayne Simson... anybody remember Roosevelt Leeks, thge Texas Freeshman RB in the 70's...???
Health and Luck will outrun Projection every time!!!
PS... TINSTAAPP
This piece is misleading. Yes Humber was a high pick / big prospect who never panned out. Pulsipher, despite being a high pick, is a sinker ball pitcher who pitches to contact. That type of pitcher profiles as a 3rd starter at best. Guerra enjoyed success at the lowest levels of minor league baseball. Our system around that time was not viewed as strong by people outside of NY. Fast forward to 2014: Harvey, Wheeler, Degrom have already showed signs of being top of the rotation pitchers IN THE MAJOR LEAGUES. Synderguard is one of the games biggest prospects. Matz will be a top 50 prospect on most lists before the year starts. Our system is looked at now as being in the top third of baseball. Comparing the state of the Mets minor league system in 06 to their system now is like comparing apples to oranges.
Is that Fernado Martinez? Ugh
How Holt got ranked is beyond me - must have been solely on draft position.
Other than that, you can't argue with Flores, Niese, Meija, Wheeler and even Davis's ranking.
I do agree with TINSTAAPP - however, I think that risk gets smaller at higher levels of the minors.
Now - here is the other side of the coin.
In 2012, here is what Baseball America said of one of our pitching prospects who was ranked #54:
He has the stuff to outperform recent Tar Heels alumni in a major league rotation, with the bullpen a good fallback option.
Doesn't sound like the guy who would start the 2013 All Star Game and be one of the 5 best pitchers in baseball.
Yes, that is Harvey
Lew...Holt was pretty "Real Deal"...Mid 90's fastball...good pedigree...great Production...SORE ARM.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=holt--001bra
The h/9, k/9...he had great stuff, and it was playing up at progressive levels.... he's not the Exception to the rule...he IS The Rule!!!
I think I am confusing Holt with Kunz
Holt ended up with control issues - right? In his head as much as Mackey Sasser's inability to throw the ball back to the pitcher
To all:
I tried as hard as I could to be as positive as I could back in those days.
Let me know if you'd like me to find more like this one and I'll post them up in future Morning Reports.
Lastly,
I wish all of you a wonderful and safe New Year's. I don't know what 2015 is going to bring for all of us.
I'll see you all in a few days.
Mack
Mack - Happy New Year to you to - may 2015 bring us all reasons for optimism
Before all the lights are shut off in Macksville, remember that Holt and Kunz are both 4 letter words, Lew. And...
Why I thought of Anthony Young, I'll never know. The man who went 3-31 in two back-to-back years for the Mets? Well, if you looked at him off of his 1990 season in AA, he'd be deemed the next coming. He was 15-3, 1.65 in 23 starts that year. And was baseball America's #26 prospect after that season. The ultimate mis-read of a future dud.
I think this just shows that scouting, statistics and other "methods" of evaluation are nothing more then educated "guesses".........trying to project what a player will do in the future and/or at a different level is a crapshoot.
A great example is Jacob DeGrom........converted position player, significant surgery and a short track record of solid results (i.e. mixed).
ROOKIE OF THE YEAR!
Mike Pelphrey was the antithesis of DeGrom and he ended up "meh".
That's why I like Sandy's approach........lots of depth! Not all will be great, but not all will be busts, either.
Tom I recall Anthony Young being the ultimate proof that W-L records are not all on the pitcher.
In 1993 when he went 1-16, his ERA+ was 107.
So, he was 7% better than an average pitcher and still lost 16 games - that is BAD LUCK
Gents,
Happy new year to all.
Mack,
Great reminder that we all get happy drunk on those prospects, and it is always really a crap shoot. Most of the current crop will come up short for one reason or another. But, the difference now is that the pool is bigger. This system is deeper than it has every been from my recollection. That offers no guarantees, but just makes it more likely that some will pan out, be it that they are on a top 10 list or be it that they are like deGrom and Lagares and come out of the blue.
Post a Comment