Mike's Mets - A Missed Opportunity

 

By Mike Steffanos

The original plan for Citi Field called for a retractable dome roof. But it was cheaper for the Wilpons to build their new stadium without one.

When the Mets have an important series disrupted by the whims of Mother Nature, I often think back to the original concept of the Mets' new ballpark which included a dome that retracted out over the parking lot when not in use. Apparently, I'm not the only one. Jon Heyman wrote a piece for the New York Post yesterday promoting the idea of Steve Cohen shelling out a large chunk of change to add a retractable roof to Citi Field. I really wish that he would, but I understand that it's incredibly unlikely to happen.

A bit of background here. When Fred and Jeff Wilpon were pushing for a replacement for Shea Stadium in the late 1990s, their plans called for a stadium with a retractable roof. This concept was thought to combine the best of both worlds. In nice weather, the dome could be open and baseball could be played in the manner that it's been since its creation — outside. In bad weather, the dome could be closed and games could go on.

People who had tickets to games against the Braves this weekend could have shown up to the ballpark with full confidence that they would be watching a baseball game. Opening Day would have been able to be played as scheduled. There would be no need to force fans and ballplayers to endure weather conditions better suited for hockey than for baseball, like those cold, raw days when the wind coming off of Flushing Bay feels like it's blowing straight out of the Arctic.

According to Heyman's piece, Steve Cohen has investigated the possibility of adding a roof. The estimate he received was around $800,000,000. While Cohen has hardly been tight-fisted since taking over this franchise, spending around a billion dollars on fixing the Wilpon's mistake is likely to be a bit rich even for his blood. Of course, if Fred and Jeff had just stuck to the plan, that roof would have been much cheaper. According to Heyman:

Sources suggest the Wilpons did investigate a roof back in 2007 when they were conceiving of Citi Field and found it would cost an additional $100 million to $125 million back then. I’m not here to bash the Wilpons. They did know their real estate, and Citi Field is one of the best of the newer parks in baseball (say what you want about the Wilpons, but they succeeded with their TV endeavor, SNY, and they did know their real estate, which was their main business)...

For those bad at math, the cost is about seven times that now. Forget inflation, which isn’t low, the bigger issues are many, including retrofitting the roof to fit the existing structure and fortifying the land, which is said to be soft.

Should Cohen decide to go for it, the work on this roof would have to take place in the winter, which, while certainly doable, would only add an extra layer of difficulty to the project. I lack the expertise to know whether it was feasible to do this thing in a single winter, but I would tend to doubt it. So you're talking about a multi-year project. That would only increase the likelihood that the final outlay would be even higher than that $800 million estimate.

To finish reading this article on Mike's Mets, please click here.